Abstract
Signs are the center of a city’s identity that is more than just intermediaries, rather they are also a vital component of that identity; both physically and culturally. This research examines semiotic citizenship’s role in developing the language landscape and determines whether or not the language landscape contributes to constructing socio-political identities. The purpose of this research is a comprehensive multimodal survey of multilingual signs and advertisements seen in public places, also known as the linguistic landscape as signs created by individuals of any area indicate their direct connection with the city and ownership. The data collected for this research includes 825 photographic samples from roadside restaurants, advertisements, hospitals, various shops, and other sources in the cities, Lahore, Rawalpindi and Islamabad. The theoretical framework used for this research is Linguistic Landscape Theory from the perspective of Landry–Bourhis (1997). The findings highlight that Urdu and English, language and sometimes Punjabi is preferred on street signs. Furthermore, Urdu was the language of choice in the Tourist Destination and its more modest surroundings, whereas English was in the business districts. In general, language and signs are used to describe the linguistic landscape in Pakistan.
Key Words
Sign, Landscape, Survey, Intermediaries, Socio-Political, Multilingual
Introduction
Language plays a vital role in building social construction and societal norms such as Friedkin (2013) states that “the literature on social cohesion has become increasingly disorganized with the increase of multiple researchers in that field.( Friedkin, 2013, p.25)” He further suggests that social cohesion is primarily a question of how individuals interact with other groups to overcome this “theoretical disorganization.” Through our interactions with others in life as individualists, societal members, or institutions, we are constantly constructing and negotiating our identities. Furthermore, Waqar et al. (2020) suggest that human relationship necessitates communication, which is accomplished through language with the emergence of the connection between identity, language, and social cohesion.
Every society has its own speciesism of language, as Harris et al. (2008) state that the noun "woh," is used solely for the third person in Punjabi, Hindi, and Urdu which does not distinguish between gender and humanness. In contrast to English, when a language assigns a gender to a non-living object, all non-living things are assigned a gender and the idea is known as grammatical gender, which is directly connected with semiotics and signs. However, this does not suggest that everyone who speaks Urdu, Hindi, or Punjabi respects everyone in the same manner or equally; the way a language is conveyed does not represent how individuals feel about other people. Further, Riaz (2021) states that humans and non-humans are divided into two categories in English language by using the third-person singular pronoun for humans and non-humans.
Socio-political Background of Pakistan
Using the linguistic landscape, a sociolinguistic phenomenon is also an excellent idea to promote language and culture. From commercial billboards and traffic signs to public service announcements and the written walls of schools, universities, hospitals, museums, and even airports, the linguistic landscape penetrates daily life. The nation's elite has long dominated Pakistani politics. The three significant actors were the military, the feudal classes who held the land, and the industrialist classes who owned the companies. There have been times when representatives from each community ruled Pakistan, as well as times when they fought for or against each other even though their pleas for assistance were acknowledged verbally; more needed to be done to promote their cause, as each institution remained insulated from the realities of the struggles of the urban professional and middle classes and the rural poor.
In the past decade, there have been three significant developments that have contributed to this rapid upheaval. Personal electronic media's rise is the most influential and crucial factor. In the 1990s, most Pakistanis were either illiterate or disinterested in reading newspapers, making it difficult for them to obtain information that was not state-sponsored or, at best, propagandistic. The BBC's radio and television coverage of significant events in Pakistan was excellent. However, much like other worldwide news channels, it must devote less attention to mundane matters if it wishes to succeed. Thus, governments can influence the terms of current political debates. Not that they were carefree, but their problems were from rival elites, not commoners.
Anyone with even a passing interest in South Asia can attest to the reality that this perception of Pakistan has changed considerably. Pakistan today has hundreds of news outlets, many of which have significant political and ideological biases. Some are particularly peculiar to a particular place or race. Few of them have a national influence. This fad began at the beginning of this decade and has recently ended due to market saturation. True, few of these publications will win awards for gentle understatement or subdued prescience. Nonetheless, the media has given voice to numerous hitherto unknown individuals. It has become a historical force due to its ability to mold and gratify a large audience. It contains antigovernment attitude, prejudice, gore, humor, and investigative reporting. The alternative may be desirable, but its debut is lauded since it is the first to give disadvantaged populations a voice.
This modification results in two outcomes. First, the urban middle class did what urban middle classes did: they purchased televisions and computers, granting them access to the expansion of private media in ways no one could have anticipated. Second, it pulled down the wall that separated Pakistani politics from the masses, allowing people to protest the government about issues such as high flour prices, insufficient energy, and discriminatory law enforcement. Seymour Lipset authored one of the significant works in Political Science on democracy, its connection to urbanized middle classes, and how the goals and beliefs of the latter almost always led them to support the former fifty years ago. There was solid evidence to back Lipset's conclusions.
Domestic nationalism and pathological suspicion of foreign powers, such as the United States and India, have increased in response to Pakistan's turn to populist politics. No longer does the military establishment monopolize absurd conspiracy theories and reflexive defensiveness. There is little doubt that the United States has become increasingly conservative and xenophobic during the past decade. The majority of these viewpoints are completely absurd, such as the notion that Israel, India, and the United States are plotting to destroy Pakistan and redraw its boundaries and that terrorist acts are being prepared in Pakistan. Nonetheless, there are strong winds based on reasoning and evidence that fuel this anger, such as the discoveries that Blackwater was working there and the United States increasingly lenient stance toward action in Balochistan.
This research focuses on the issues of bilingual and multi-lingual languages and has a valuable noteworthiness that will open another paradigm to contemplate the disparity of language in culture, religion, business and socio-political scenario because the culture and ethnicity are presented through the sign boards in every city.
Research Objectives
The aims of the study are:
? to explore the purpose of signage and to examine the dominance of a language
? to explore to what extent linguistic landscape reflects and shapes ideologies in a specified urban space
Research Questions
a. Which language is preferred in the street signs; Urdu, English, or Punjabi?
b. How semiotic citizenship plays a role in linguistic landscape?
Literature Review
Language acts as a communication tool containing a set of sounds, grammar, and words. In this regard, the research is done on the Semi-genic system in globalization and linguistics by Hasan (2004), which foregrounds the significance of language and semantic variations. Hasan’s work substantiates the demand to see language variation in World Englishes more than in structural terms. Furthermore, Gulzar et al. (2021) highlight that language is the only system of sounds used by human beings in different variations. Besides this, another system of sounds (e.g., thunder, music, buzzing) also establishes meaning for us. Language plays a variety of roles in reading, listening, writing, and speaking. Language in writing has a different meaning than reading as our writing system includes a visual system to comprehend the meaning. We use our visual system to make meaning through sign language, color, and size of anything we see. Dunayer (2001) refers that linguistic rights focus on the human and civil rights of individuals and groups, so they can choose their preferred language or languages of communication in the private or public sphere.
Furthermore, about language communication, Rehman (2004) analyzes that human interaction requires communication that is favored by language. Hence, due to this, the connection between identity, language, and social cohesion emerges. Haider (2009) looked at a study that traced the relationship between Indian nationalism and literary and linguistic histories, he highlighted that the usage of a linguistic tool differs depending on the child’s parentage. Urdu is the national language of Pakistan, however, it is rapidly becoming extinct, overtaken by the English language in current times. Furthermore, Shohamy (2009) showed that the “phonetic scene provides a crystal of dialects that are inserted in networks and arranged in the humanistic, social, and POA. It has a more global approach to deal with LL that has been formed, resulting in an expansion of the inquiry sites” (Shohamy, 2009, p. 2). In Barni–Bagna’s (2015) research, quantitative overviews and sign tallying were early approaches that showed a complicated relationship between language and area between individuals. He highlights that creating a persona through web-based media pages is not an unusual occurrence, rather, it is defined by the inter-subjectivity of the two dependents on online relationships that are referred to as the “aggregate construction of oneself.”
However, language limitation varies from area to area because the language serves as a sound system that is contributed in both languages; English and Urdu. Cooper (1989) coined “linguistic Imperialism” to describe this phenomenon as a foundation for social imperialism, which is concerned with the transmission of the norms and behaviors of model social systems, enshrined in the language. Galtung (1980) states that the process of the transference of social culture and values is centralized by the West because language shift plays an important role in constructing lingual and social cohesion. Nahir (1988) stated that language shift (LS) aims at the shifting of the speaker’s usage of language from one another. According to Weber (1968), the state’s elite class is responsible for setting linguistic discourse structure in society because it is self-contained and positions itself as a mediator between opposing interest groups.
The distribution of the two languages in Pakistan’s business signage is marked by a high degree of visual consistency, and communicative and symbolic complementarity results in balanced written bilingualism. Cummins (2020) highlights the motivations of the relevant signs handling the linguistic choices should provide us with a better picture of the role of private signboard managers as covert language planners. To this, a full account of the emergence of the English language in South Asia in Kachru’s (1997) book, as he categorizes the “World Englishes” in three phases. The arrival of missionaries in India in the 17th century established various schools around the country. In the early stages of the development of SAE [South Asian English], it should be noted that the teachers’ methods of instruction and language backgrounds had a considerable impact on the language. Cameron (1996) suggests that gender and identity can be influenced by how we perceive and act in the world around us, as language plays a vital role. He further states that we are born with a biologically determined gender, but not with a race or ethnicity. As an additional point of emphasis, Harrison (2008) emphasizes the intensity of the loss caused by language extinction; "when languages die, an immense edifice of human knowledge are painstakingly constructed over millennia by innumerable minds, are disintegrating, and eventually fading into oblivion" (Harrison, 2008, p. 3).
Schneider (2007) says that, however, biologists construct taxonomies based on the genealogical or structural characteristics of animals and plants, these taxonomies frequently do not include any information about the interrelationships of interdependencies between living forms, or other natural environments that coexist in the same geographic area. This information contributes to the popular misconception that when a species of life goes extinct,it impacts not only that species but also every other species in the system, especially those species with interrelationships. Herzfeld (2013) says that only a few of these were/are performed in settled areas; many more were practiced by nomadic and distant populations in pre-colonial South Asia, which outnumbered settled civilizations by a factor of many to one. Not every one of these techniques has been identified or has a name associated with it and Europeans named numerous tribes, such as the Kalasha of Pakistan’s highlands, who were previously unknown. Zeshan (2000) is of the view that many indigenous populations were also converted to one of the region's major religions (with Islam, Hinduism, and Christianity being dominant). Despite the time, the Kalasha people are still subjected to religious conversion pressure.
Research Methodology
This research was quantitative as data was collected
by using samples which were roadside images, the flex of restaurants, and many more. Around 825 pictures were selected from which 15 were taken as a sample to explain the research questions for the current study. The researcher has collected data from local businesses and signboards on the roadside from streets of different cities of Pakistan; such as Chakwal, Rawalpindi, Islamabad, Lahore, etc. A total of 825 pictures were selected for this research where 107 images (13 percent) were from advertisements and 330 (40 percent) images were of bill boards/ sign boards, 83 (10 percent) images were of the wall advertisements and remaining 305 images (37 percent) were from restaurants which were mostly in bilingual method. Each photo sample was treated differently to differentiate between the signs’ genres and the representation of the specific businesses.
Theoretical Framework
The theoretical framework used for this research is Linguistic Landscape Theory from the perspective of Landry–Bourhis (1997). According to him, the skills required for signboards implies a particular level of literacy to represent the linguistic landscape accurately as the absence of signs in a specific language implies that the language does not have a writing system. The second anticipated reader condition is concerned with the sign’s communication intention as of a dominant group’s language, the minority group’s language, and a foreign language that is incorporated into the sign’s construction.
It is a sociological framework that deals with the investigation of linguistic diversity as Landry–Bourhis (1997) states that constructing alternative hypotheses in linguistic landscape studies is possible by using three principles. These are the following;
1. Making a good first impression
2. Reasonable justifications should be provided
3. Power and authority relationships.
According to the first principle that by the presentation of self; individuals attain their objectives by expressing their identities daily. Performers, for example, compete with one another to attract the attention of a passing pedestrian through the use of various forms of communication. Individuality, special status, and language domination are ways through which businessman expresses themselves in a specific location. On the one hand, the good impression principle concerns the notion through which retailers strive to influence the audience with enticing indicators employed on signboards. Secondly, how the retailers express themselves and assert their identities and personalities on the signboards. This action can be seen as one devoted to one particular group of people in the general public. For example, in the case of halal signboards, the word attracts clients while simultaneously conveying loyalty to a certain cause. And lastly, a major theme in the concept of power relationships is that people exert control over others by enforcing their pattern of behavior. In those indications, the dominant group’s language is being practiced rather than the language of subordinate groups.
As a result of simulating an unlimited number of Linguistic Landscape language learning opportunities, the virtual etymological scene will develop a virtual phonetic information or semantic asset, which can be utilized as a language asset and informative discussion for language selection. Thus, resulting in an unlimited number of potential outcomes of unknown dialect contribution for anyone who is studying any language. It is important to consider the dependability of this study because it is based on self-revealed information rather than a coordinated perception in this investigation.
Discussion and Analysis
When conducted
properly, linguistic landscape research offers the fieldworker as a user-friendly
toolkit for finding the most relevant elements of sociolinguistic regimes in a
given region, regardless of whether the location is monolingual or
multilingual. Four separate patterns emerge from the combination of photographs
of billboards/signboards, wall adverts, and roadside posters, which can be seen
below. Advertising often uses figurative language to sway people into making a
purchase. Advertising tries to reach consumers using mediums they are already
frequent and familiar with. That's why language and marketing can't be
separated. Advertisers use various languages to communicate with potential
buyers, provide them with product information, and sway their purchasing
decisions. Therefore, the language used in ads ought to educate, persuade,
entertain, and entice. The commercial's speech should grab and keep the
attention of viewers. Commercials delivered in the target audience's native
tongue are more likely to be remembered long after the audience has decided
whether to make a purchase. This research is using advertisements like business
advertisements. A total of 825 pictures were selected for this research where
107 images (13 percent) were from advertisements and 330 (40 percent) images
were of bill boards/ sign boards, 83 (10 percent) images were of the wall
advertisements and remaining 305 images (37 percent) were from restaurants
which were mostly in bilingual method.
Table 1. Respondents and research tools
Research
Instruments |
Respondents Number |
Total Photographs |
825 |
Sample |
15 |
From the data, a
maximum number of examples are produced in a manner that is not Roman and could
be referred to as an English transcription in Urdu. The signs embody the
commercial enterprise that is proprietors/carrier companies who use English
lexical elements to provide an explanation for the character of the
product/provider they deliver, but the textual content is written in Urdu
script. Urdu is written in Arabic/Persian, moreover, there are other factors
that demonstrate the hybridization of language mixing, in which Arabic and
English are combined with each other in an advertisement placed on a billboard
or a wall.
English in non-Roman script
Figure 1: District Complex
This figure shows that the script is written in Roman or Arabic/Persian as English is written within the non-Roman Urdu alphabet. Two instances are shown in Figure 1, first, the non-Roman script name of a government office is transliterated into Urdu in the picture at the left. The office is in a sub-city region of Chakwal this is ordinarily administered by using the Pakistan Government. Its English translation is as follows: ?? ????? ?????? [District Complex] Chakwal. In Pakistan, one of the maximum common locations for classified ads is on the partitions. This seemingly unconventional kind of advertising is a not unusual incidence in Pakistan’s linguistic panorama.
Conclusion
Individual citizens may also post personal advertisements on the walls, in addition to the commercial advertisements that are already there in Pakistan, advertising with flex boards is widespread street marketing. The restaurant’s menu is not written in the Roman alphabet but in English because of the common belief that the English language is unusual, there is a pressing need for the English language to be translated into other languages. This particular establishment is a dining establishment as this serves the purpose of highlighting the semiotic possibilities that are there in the original language. Financial considerations are probably the driving force behind this tactic as through the translation process, the message or content is modified so that it is appropriate for the sociocultural and academic setting of the observer. In Pakistan, the English script transcribes the Roman or Urdu original instead of using Urdu writing, as can be seen in bilingual signs. This is because Pakistan is a multilingual country and placards containing advertisements for various goods and services are typically written in both English and Urdu. It does not matter which word you choose to use to describe the products or services because there is a larger appeal in text deviation in Pakistan. The soft cloth has inscriptions in Urdu and English; the words are virtually word-for-word advertisements for the restaurant. In a manner very similar to the last example the entirety of the Urdu language is included, even though the document is written in English. In the English language, [CHAI] is an abbreviation.
Using one’s command of the English language is a proxy for one’s position in society which is an essential component of Pakistan’s social and economic stratification, and is analogous to that of the present in the United States. There is a wealth of symbolic meaning in the English language as we are aware that the symbolic components of the English language contribute to the process of establishing the marketability and fashion potential of the language. In most instances, the phrase “energy domain names” is written in English because the importance of brand recognition cannot be overstated in a global economy that is increasingly relying on the English language. The English language is widely spoken across the globe and in Pakistani culture, both the past and the present coexist. People are more comfortable communicating with one another using English terminology as opposed to Urdu or any of the other contemporary languages. A number of business owners give their companies names that are memorable and catchy as one successful bakery owner made the conscious decision to give his business an English name to attract a more affluent and cultured customer. The English language can convey magnificence in its various forms. Evidence suggests that children and teenagers from privileged backgrounds seek to be members of elite groups, and this aspiration is not limited to the social aristocracy. These communities have a high level of life together with an air of refinement and a forward-thinking mentality. They are also immensely proud of their English heritage.
References
- Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape an International Journal, 1(1-2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.01bar
- Ben-Rafael, E. (2009). A Sociological Approach to the Study of Linguistic Landscapes. London: Routledge.
- Cameron, D. (1996). The language-gender interface: challenging co-optation. Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, 31- 53.
- Cooper, R. L. C. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University, Press.
- Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy. In Language, Power, and Pedagogy; Multilingual matters.
- Dunayer, J. (2001). Animal equality. Ryce Pub.
- Friedkin, W. (2013). The Friedkin Connection: A Memoir. Harper Collins.
- Galtung, J. (1980). Essays in Peace Research: Peace problems: some case studies, (5). Ejlers.
- Gulzar, K., Khan, I. U., Khan, S. A., Khan, S., & Mumtaz, I. (2021). Multimodal Analysis of Covid 19 Visual Messages In Pakistan And India: A Comparative Study. Multicultural Education, 7(7), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.511658
- Haider, S. (2009). Semiotics Ideology and Femininity in Popular Pakistani Women’s Magazines. Hawwa, 7(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920709x12579112681765
- Harris, K. M., Mahone, E. M., & Singer, H. S. (2008). Nonautistic motor stereotypies: In Dialect and language variation. Academic Press.
- Harrison, K. D. (2008). When languages die: The extinction of the world's languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford University Press.
- Herzfeld, M. (2013). CSSH Notes. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 55(4), 1017.
- Kachru, B. B. (1997). World Englishes and English- Using Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003287
- Lakoff, R. (1986). You say what you are: Acceptability and gender-related language. In Dialect and language variation. Academic Press.
- Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23– 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x970161002
- Nahir, M. (1988). Language planning and language acquisition: The great leap in the Hebrew revival. International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education, 289.
- Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality and polarization in Pakistan. OUP Pakistan.
- Riaz, M. (2021). Semiotics of rape in Pakistan: What’s missing in the digital illustrations? Discourse & Communication, 15(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002036
- Rubab, S., Ali, S., Anwaar, Z., Sheraz, A., & Hassan, N. (2021). A Semiotic Analysis of Conflation of Beauty and Feminism in Pakistani Advertisements. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 57, 272-280. http://hkjoss.com/index.php/journal/article/view/436/432
- Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press.
- Shohamy & D. Gorter. (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
- Waqar, S., Naz, S., & Ghani, M. (2020). Persuasion/Dissuasion on National Interest Agenda: A Semiotic Analysis of Pakistani Newspaper Cartoons. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n3p68
- Weber, M. (1968). Volume Three of Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology.
- Zeshan, U. (2000). Sign Language in Indo-Pakistan. A description of a signed language.
- Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape an International Journal, 1(1-2), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.01bar
- Ben-Rafael, E. (2009). A Sociological Approach to the Study of Linguistic Landscapes. London: Routledge.
- Cameron, D. (1996). The language-gender interface: challenging co-optation. Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice, 31- 53.
- Cooper, R. L. C. (1989). Language planning and social change. Cambridge University, Press.
- Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy. In Language, Power, and Pedagogy; Multilingual matters.
- Dunayer, J. (2001). Animal equality. Ryce Pub.
- Friedkin, W. (2013). The Friedkin Connection: A Memoir. Harper Collins.
- Galtung, J. (1980). Essays in Peace Research: Peace problems: some case studies, (5). Ejlers.
- Gulzar, K., Khan, I. U., Khan, S. A., Khan, S., & Mumtaz, I. (2021). Multimodal Analysis of Covid 19 Visual Messages In Pakistan And India: A Comparative Study. Multicultural Education, 7(7), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.511658
- Haider, S. (2009). Semiotics Ideology and Femininity in Popular Pakistani Women’s Magazines. Hawwa, 7(3), 229–248. https://doi.org/10.1163/156920709x12579112681765
- Harris, K. M., Mahone, E. M., & Singer, H. S. (2008). Nonautistic motor stereotypies: In Dialect and language variation. Academic Press.
- Harrison, K. D. (2008). When languages die: The extinction of the world's languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford University Press.
- Herzfeld, M. (2013). CSSH Notes. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 55(4), 1017.
- Kachru, B. B. (1997). World Englishes and English- Using Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 66–87. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500003287
- Lakoff, R. (1986). You say what you are: Acceptability and gender-related language. In Dialect and language variation. Academic Press.
- Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1997). Linguistic Landscape and Ethnolinguistic Vitality. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23– 49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x970161002
- Nahir, M. (1988). Language planning and language acquisition: The great leap in the Hebrew revival. International handbook of bilingualism and bilingual education, 289.
- Rahman, T. (2004). Denizens of alien worlds: A study of education, inequality and polarization in Pakistan. OUP Pakistan.
- Riaz, M. (2021). Semiotics of rape in Pakistan: What’s missing in the digital illustrations? Discourse & Communication, 15(4), 433–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/17504813211002036
- Rubab, S., Ali, S., Anwaar, Z., Sheraz, A., & Hassan, N. (2021). A Semiotic Analysis of Conflation of Beauty and Feminism in Pakistani Advertisements. Hong Kong Journal of Social Sciences, 57, 272-280. http://hkjoss.com/index.php/journal/article/view/436/432
- Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the world. Cambridge University Press.
- Shohamy & D. Gorter. (2009). Linguistic Landscape: Expanding the Scenery. London: Routledge.
- Waqar, S., Naz, S., & Ghani, M. (2020). Persuasion/Dissuasion on National Interest Agenda: A Semiotic Analysis of Pakistani Newspaper Cartoons. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n3p68
- Weber, M. (1968). Volume Three of Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology.
- Zeshan, U. (2000). Sign Language in Indo-Pakistan. A description of a signed language.
Cite this article
-
APA : Afzal, S., Tehseem, T., & Faiz, R. (2022). Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Global Sociological Review, VII(III), 10-22. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).02
-
CHICAGO : Afzal, Summaya, Tazanfal Tehseem, and Rabia Faiz. 2022. "Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective." Global Sociological Review, VII (III): 10-22 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).02
-
HARVARD : AFZAL, S., TEHSEEM, T. & FAIZ, R. 2022. Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective. Global Sociological Review, VII, 10-22.
-
MHRA : Afzal, Summaya, Tazanfal Tehseem, and Rabia Faiz. 2022. "Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective." Global Sociological Review, VII: 10-22
-
MLA : Afzal, Summaya, Tazanfal Tehseem, and Rabia Faiz. "Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective." Global Sociological Review, VII.III (2022): 10-22 Print.
-
OXFORD : Afzal, Summaya, Tehseem, Tazanfal, and Faiz, Rabia (2022), "Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective", Global Sociological Review, VII (III), 10-22
-
TURABIAN : Afzal, Summaya, Tazanfal Tehseem, and Rabia Faiz. "Exploring Indigenous Culture Through the Linguistic Landscape in Pakistan: A Sociolinguistic Perspective." Global Sociological Review VII, no. III (2022): 10-22. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-III).02