http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).21
10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).21
Published : Jun 2022
Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator
This study is aimed at the content analysis of three socioeconomic factors considered central to the sustainable development goals, namely education, poverty, and gender equality comparatively among provinces of Pakistan, keeping in view the framework of sustainable development. For this purpose, secondary data under the quantitative method was used to gather data from the archival of national and provincial level reports. Developing theories are used under the thematic framework. It can place a brick for sustainable development in education, poverty, and gender equality indicators. The least developed region, Balochistan, and its backwardness were mainly focused on. The ten years of official statistics reveal that Balochistan lags in all developmental indicators compared to other provinces. There is a high illiteracy rate, absolute poverty, and gender inequality in Balochistan. Hence, this research would be helpful in policy-making and academic work for the remote or underdeveloped areas of Pakistan.
-
Inter-Provincial Time Series, Modernization, Sustainable Development Goals, Performances
-
(1) Muhammad Sharif
M. Phil Scholar, Department of Sociology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Abdul Raheem
M. Phil Scholar, Department of Anthropology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
(3) Gautam Mohan
Graduate Student, Department of Sociology, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Andrews, N., & Bawa, S. (2014). A post- development hoax?(Re)-examining the past, present and future of development studies. Third World Quarterly, 35(6), 922- 938. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2014.907704
- Biesta, G. (2009). Good education in an age of measurement: On the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability (formerly: Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education), 21(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9064-9
- Clayton, B. a. (2002). Sustainable Development Strategies: a Resource Book. London: Earthscan Publications.
- Dasgupta, S., Hamilton, K., Pandey, K. D., & Wheeler, D. (2006). Environment during growth: accounting for governance and vulnerability. World development, 34(9), 1597-1611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.12.008
- Dlouhá, J., & PospÃÅ¡ilová, M. (2018). Education for Sustainable Development Goals in public debate: The importance of participatory research in reflecting and supporting the consultation process in developing a vision for Czech education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4314–4327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.145
- Duke, C. (1987). Adult education, poverty and development. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 6(4), 319-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260137870060405
- Emas, R. (2015). The concept of Sustainable Developmennt. sustainable development un org.
- Esquivel, V. a. (2016). Gender and the Sustainable development Goals. Rutledge.
- Hyman, H. (1987). Secondary Analysis of Sample Surveys. Wesleyan University Press; New edition.
- Karl, T. (2015, September 27). Revise Sociology. www.revisesociology.com
- Koehler, G. (2016). Tapping the Sustainable Development Goals for progressive genderequity and equality policy. Oxfam, Rutledge Gender & Development Publications.
- MacEachen, E. (Ed.). (2019). The science and politics of work disability prevention. New York: Routledge.Dalal-
- Maida, U. & Zahid. (2018). SDG Index for Pakistan at Provincial Level. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. 1-21.
- Max, H. N. (1988). Dependency Theory in Comparative Education: Twelve Lessons from the Literature. CERC's Electronic Book.
- Nguyen, T. P. (2019). Searching for education for sustainable development in Vietnam. Environmental Education Research, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1569202
- Ofei-Manu, D. (2015). The role of education in the sustainable development agends: Empowering a learning society for suntainability through quality education. 95-133.
- Paris, D. P. (2005, March). Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness. Paris: High Level Forum.
- Pierson, P. (1993). When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change. World Politics, 45(4), 595-628. https://doi.org/10.2307/2950710
- Robert, J. (2015, 7 1). The role of education in the sustainable development agenda. The role of education in the sustainable development agenda, 95-133.
- Roux, A &Teise, K. (2016). Education for Sustainable Development in South Africa: A Model Case Scenario. Africa Education Review, 13(3-4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2016.1224584
- Sonntag, H. (2001). Dependency Theory. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
- Staszewske, K. C. (2015). Making Financing for Development Work for Gender Equality: what is needed at Addis and beyond?. London: GADN.
- Sterling, S. (2016). A Commentary on Education and Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 10(2), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0973408216661886
- Swallow, B. (2005). Potential for poverty reduction strategies to address community priorities:case study of Kenya. World Development, 33(2), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.015
- Swanson, A. a. (2003). Public Environmental Expenditure Reviews: experience and emerging practice. Washington DC: World Bank.
- Valeria, E. S. (2016). Gender and the Sustainable Development Goals. Gender & Development, 24(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552074.2016.1153318
- Veen, R. van der, & Preece, J. (2005). Poverty reduction and adult education: beyond basic education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 24(5), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370500169723
- Virtanen, M. A. (2017). Dependency Theory – A Conceptual Lens to Understand China’s Presence in Africa? Forum for Development Studies, 44(3), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1281161
Cite this article
-
APA : Sharif, M., Raheem, A., & Mohan, G. (2022). Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator. Global Sociological Review, VII(II), 194-207. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).21
-
CHICAGO : Sharif, Muhammad, Abdul Raheem, and Gautam Mohan. 2022. "Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator." Global Sociological Review, VII (II): 194-207 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).21
-
HARVARD : SHARIF, M., RAHEEM, A. & MOHAN, G. 2022. Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator. Global Sociological Review, VII, 194-207.
-
MHRA : Sharif, Muhammad, Abdul Raheem, and Gautam Mohan. 2022. "Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator." Global Sociological Review, VII: 194-207
-
MLA : Sharif, Muhammad, Abdul Raheem, and Gautam Mohan. "Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator." Global Sociological Review, VII.II (2022): 194-207 Print.
-
OXFORD : Sharif, Muhammad, Raheem, Abdul, and Mohan, Gautam (2022), "Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator", Global Sociological Review, VII (II), 194-207
-
TURABIAN : Sharif, Muhammad, Abdul Raheem, and Gautam Mohan. "Bringing Modernization Debate Back in: Inter-Provincial time Series Performance and Forecasting of Key Sustainable Development Indicator." Global Sociological Review VII, no. II (2022): 194-207. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).21