ARTICLE

AN ANALYSIS OF THE PARTICIPANTS DISAGREEMENT STRATEGIES IN COMPUTER MEDIATED INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION CMIC

16 Pages : 149-158

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).16      10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).16      Published : Jun 2022

An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)

    This study explores disagreement strategies in the context of a multicultural Computer-mediated-classroom (CMC) with English as a medium of instruction and communication. It studies how disagreement strategies are influenced by the participants' own cultural pragmatic rules and pose problems for others to follow them as intended. The speech acts of strong and mitigated disagreement are analyzed in detail, with different participants employing different strategies as adopted from their respective cultures. CMC, being a contemporary medium of communication in its own right, is rich in new possibilities for intercultural exchange and collaboration in virtual rather than physical space in which the participants' strategies express differing opinions, or a change in the interpretation of an idea, in the form of contrastive connectives and concussive transition markers. The study concludes that speakers with a lower level of linguistic competence need to be equipped with essential pragmalingusitc strategies and skills in disagreement strategies in intercultural situations.

    CMC, Disagreement Strategies, Multicultural Classrooms, Pragmalinguistics
    (1) Muhammad Ishtiaq
    Assistant Professor, Department of English, Government Degree College Takht-e-Nasrati Karak, KP, Pakistan
    (2) Nasim Gul
    Lecturer, Department of English, Kohat University of Science and Technology (KUST) Kohat, KP, Pakistan
    (3) Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal
    Lecturer, Department of English and Applied Linguistics, University of Lakki Marwat, KP, Pakistan
  • Abercrombie, D. (1968). Paralanguage. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3(1), 55-59.
  • Brown, P., Levinson, S. C., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage 4, Cambridge University press.
  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts 41-58.
  • Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies (No. 1). Cambridge University Press.
  • Kakavá, C. (1993). Negotiation of disagreement by Greeks in conversations and classroom discourse. Georgetown University.
  • Kecskes, I. (2011). Understanding the role of context in language use. Pragmatics and context, Toronto, Antares.
  • Locher, M. A. (2010). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication (Vol. 12). Walter de Gruyter.
  • Mehrabian, A., & Ferris, S. R. (1967). Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels. Journal of consulting psychology, 31(3), 248.
  • Murphy, H. A., Hildebrandt, H. W., & Thomas, J. P. (1997). Effective business communications.
  • Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shaped.
  • Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of pragmatics, 32(8), 1087-1111.
  • Wolfson, N. (1990). The Bulge: A Theory of S. peech Behavior and Social Distance. Penn Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 2(1), 55-83.
  • Yule, G. (2020). The study of language. Cambridge university press.

Cite this article

    APA : Ishtiaq, M., Gul, N., & Iqbal, S. W. (2022). An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC). Global Sociological Review, VII(II), 149-158. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).16
    CHICAGO : Ishtiaq, Muhammad, Nasim Gul, and Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal. 2022. "An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)." Global Sociological Review, VII (II): 149-158 doi: 10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).16
    HARVARD : ISHTIAQ, M., GUL, N. & IQBAL, S. W. 2022. An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC). Global Sociological Review, VII, 149-158.
    MHRA : Ishtiaq, Muhammad, Nasim Gul, and Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal. 2022. "An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)." Global Sociological Review, VII: 149-158
    MLA : Ishtiaq, Muhammad, Nasim Gul, and Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal. "An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)." Global Sociological Review, VII.II (2022): 149-158 Print.
    OXFORD : Ishtiaq, Muhammad, Gul, Nasim, and Iqbal, Sahibzada Wasim (2022), "An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)", Global Sociological Review, VII (II), 149-158
    TURABIAN : Ishtiaq, Muhammad, Nasim Gul, and Sahibzada Wasim Iqbal. "An Analysis of the Participants Disagreement Strategies in Computer- mediated Intercultural Communication (CMIC)." Global Sociological Review VII, no. II (2022): 149-158. https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(VII-II).16